Area II
Teaching, Learning and Evaluation
Message of Commitment
Area II – Teaching, Learning, and Evaluation focuses on the institution’s commitment to ensuring that academic programs, teaching practices, learning experiences, and assessment processes contribute to the achievement of intended educational outcomes. It reflects how DEBESMSCAT provides a supportive and responsive academic environment where learners are guided toward the development of relevant knowledge, skills, values, and competencies. Through appropriate curricular offerings, effective instructional strategies, and systematic evaluation, the institution continuously works toward improving the quality of teaching and learning.
The different parameters under Area II provide the framework for examining how the institution establishes and maintains academic standards, implements appropriate teaching-learning processes, supports faculty and student engagement, and evaluates learning outcomes. These parameters also highlight the mechanisms used by DEBESMSCAT to monitor, review, and improve its academic programs and instructional practices. Taken together, they demonstrate the institution’s continuous efforts to ensure that teaching, learning, and evaluation are aligned with institutional goals, regulatory requirements, stakeholder needs, and the changing demands of higher education.
Dr. Elreen A. Delavin
Vice President for Academic Affairs
Institutional Portfolio
Institutional Portfolio
Read it as a bound document, or open the file itself.
Evidence & Ratings
How this area is assessed
Each parameter is judged on its systems, how they are implemented, and what they achieve. Against every indicator is the rating the area gave itself and the document that evidences it.
4.07
Overall mean rating
A Setting and Achieving Program Standards 4.15 14 indicators
| Indicator | Rating | Means of Verification |
|---|---|---|
| System — Inputs and Processes | ||
| S.1 Setting of Objectives and Learning Outcomes: Academic programs have clearly defined objectives and learning outcomes. | 4.50 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| S.1.1 The objectives and learning outcomes of a program are aligned with the institution’s Vision, Mission and Goals. | 5 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| S.1.2 There is a clear articulation of how the programs develop the attributes/desired competencies of its ideal graduates. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| S.2 Degree programs meet the specific program outcomes/competencies and standards stipulated in the PSG of the CHED. | 4.00 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| S.2.1 The curricular programs are consistent with the institution’s vision and mission and also with local, national and global development goals. | 5 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| S.2.2 The curricular programs are supported with appropriate, updated and innovative learning processes and resources. | 3 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| S.3 There is a process being followed in the preparation, deliberation, and approval of the new/revised curriculum. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| S.4 There is a process being followed in the preparation, evaluation, revision and approval of the syllabi. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| System — Inputs and Processes mean | 4.13 | |
| Implementation | ||
| I.1 Program objectives, targets or results are understood by stakeholders. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.2 Faculty translate objectives and learning outcomes in the teaching of their courses. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.3 The institution establishes and maintains comparability of standards with other providers of similar/equivalent programs. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| Implementation mean | 4.00 | |
| Outcome/s | ||
| O.1 The institution have well-designed academic programs. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| O.2 Program objectives and outcomes are achieved. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| O.3 Curricular program objectives and outcomes are compliant with CHED requirements and to the institution’s vision, mission and goals. | 5 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| Outcome/s mean | 4.33 | |
| Parameter mean | 4.15 | |
| Best Practices | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) | |
B Program Approval 4.20 27 indicators
| Indicator | Rating | Means of Verification |
|---|---|---|
| System — Inputs and Processes | ||
| S.1 There is a system for approving academic programs, revision and development. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| S.2 The process of approval of academic programs is clear to stakeholders. | 3 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| S.3 The system of approval includes alignment of resources to the Vision, Goals and Objectives. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| S.4 The system of approval reflects clear articulation of development needs of the region, nation and the world articulating the relationships and development of desired competencies. | 5 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| S.5 The system accommodates new updates in the approval of programs. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| System — Inputs and Processes mean | 4.00 | |
| Implementation | ||
| I.1 Approval of the academic programs considers: | 3.75 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.1.1 the HEI’s VMG; | 5 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.1.2 the HEI’s resources; | 3 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.1.3 the development needs of the region/country; and | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.1.4 its ability to ensure that programs enable students to achieve the specified intended outcomes. | 3 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.2 Committees at various levels are set up to act on proposed programs. | 3 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.3 Feedback from stakeholders are considered in the approval of programs. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.4 Program approval follows a process starting with the plan and ending with notification of action taken. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.5 Various committees act on the approval of programs from collegial academic discussions by the different levels namely department, college, university, and Board of Trustees/Regents. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.6 Academic programs are implemented in accordance with the terms and conditions set in the approval. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.7 Well trained faculty members facilitate student learning and are provided appropriate learning resources, facilities, and administrative support. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.8 There is regular evaluation of faculty performance and self evaluation of individual programs through licensure passing rates(when applicable), employment rates, and graduates and stakeholders feedbacks for program enhancement. | 3 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.9 The institution has policies and processes to match students’ abilities and aptitudes to the demands of the programs to which they are recruited. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.10 The institution provides academic support to students and faculty for effective teaching and learning. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.11 The institution ensures the use of pedagogical skills among faculty who are not graduates of teacher education. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.12 Learning process is enhanced through the use of varied teaching techniques and methodologies, instructional materials, computer-aided instruction and non-traditional teaching approaches to produce desirable learning outcomes. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.13 The institution has programs that allow students to practice their learned competencies in view of their future careers, such as practicum, internship and on-the-job training. | 5 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.14 Stakeholders participate in the preparation and periodic review of syllabi which are distributed to students for effective instruction. | 3 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| Implementation mean | 3.84 | |
| Outcome/s | ||
| O.1 An effective system of program approval and implementation is developed. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| O.2 The programs are consistent with Vision, Mission and Goals of the Institution. | 5 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| O.3 The objectives of the programs are consistent with the desired competencies. | 5 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| O.4 Credibility of the programs is noteworthy due to transparency of processes. | 5 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| Outcome/s mean | 4.75 | |
| Parameter mean | 4.20 | |
| Best Practices | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) | |
C Program Monitoring and Review 4.01 18 indicators
| Indicator | Rating | Means of Verification |
|---|---|---|
| System — Inputs and Processes | ||
| S.1 A system of monitoring and evaluation of programs exists in the institution. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| S.2 The institution adopts a mechanism for continuous evaluation and improvement in the delivery of academic programs. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| System — Inputs and Processes mean | 4.00 | |
| Implementation | ||
| I.1 The institution effectively uses monitoring and reviewing the effectiveness of its programs to ensure that they remain current and valid in the light of developments in the relevant field of study and related employment opportunities. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.2 The institution maintains the coherence of programs by using alternative modes of delivery system. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.3 Programs are made to remain current and valid in the light of developments in the relevant field of study and related employment. | 5 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.4 The institution ensures effective link between academic planning and resource allocation. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.5 Graduate programs (when applicable) are supported by relevant research or other advanced scholarship. | 5 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.6 Periodic review, monitoring, and evaluation of curricular programs by stakeholders are conducted to accommodate recent trends and developments. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.7 Students’ progression is periodically monitored and disseminated to students and parents for appropriate action, and remedial programs are made available, if needed. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.8 The results of the evaluation of student and faculty achievements as well as monitoring provide decisions on aspects to be revised and improved. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.9 Academic policy review and formulation are being done within three to five years for realignment with the institution’s Strategic or Development Plan. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.10 The institution’s monitoring system places content, design, operation and maintenance of evaluation procedure on expert designees. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| Implementation mean | 4.20 | |
| Outcome/s | ||
| O.1 Student achievements and awards are remarkable. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
|
O.2
High passing rate is evident in the Board and Licensure Exams as follows:
• 75% higher than the national passing average • 50% higher than the national passing average • Equal to the national passing average • Below the national passing average |
4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| O.3 The institution is recognized in the regional and national levels for the performance of its graduates in the board and bar exams is apparent. | 3 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| O.4 Acceptance and recognition of curricular programs are commendable in the local, national and international level for producing quality and employable graduates. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| O.5 Graduates demonstrate the programs desired competencies. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| O.6 The programs are comparable with similar/equivalent courses of other HEI’s. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| Outcome/s mean | 3.83 | |
| Parameter mean | 4.01 | |
| Best Practices | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) | |
D Action to Strengthen Program 3.95 15 indicators
| Indicator | Rating | Means of Verification |
|---|---|---|
| System — Inputs and Processes | ||
| S.1 There are mechanisms for disseminating good practices throughout the institution. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| S.2 There is a system for continuous improvement and innovations to strengthen programs. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| S.3 There are internal bodies (e.g. QA units, or committees) which take charge of strengthening programs. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| S.4 An external system of improving or strengthening program exists. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| S.5 The institution has an effective system of student assessment to determine students’ progress and attainment of learning outcomes. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| System — Inputs and Processes mean | 4.00 | |
| Implementation | ||
| I.1 The feedbacks from faculty, students, employers, and other stakeholders are evaluated and acted upon. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.2 Weaknesses in student performance are identified and appropriate actions are promptly taken. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.3 The institution adopts self institutional evaluation of the progress by inside experts. | 3 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.4 The institution adopts likewise external evaluation and integrates the results together with the former for strengthening the programs. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.5 Mechanisms are utilized through implementing policies on self evaluation by experts, internal monitoring by officials concerned and student evaluation. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.6 The HEI implements improvements that address the formation of their ideal graduate, which in turn depends on their vision and HEI type. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.7 The institution responds to matters that are raised through self-evaluation, formal internal monitoring, or external review. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| Implementation mean | 3.86 | |
| Outcome/s | ||
| O.1 Student Performance is remarkable. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| O.2 Employability of graduates is high. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| O.3 Feedback, especially effectiveness and impact of changes is proposed and implemented. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| Outcome/s mean | 4.00 | |
| Parameter mean | 3.95 | |
| Best Practices | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) | |
E ICT Resources 4.03 12 indicators
| Indicator | Rating | Means of Verification |
|---|---|---|
| System — Inputs and Processes | ||
| S.1 The institution has provided ICT resources to support student learning. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| S.2 There is a good ratio of students to terminals and other ICT equipment. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| System — Inputs and Processes mean | 4.00 | |
| Implementation | ||
| I.1 The institution makes effective use of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) resources to support student learning and to manage its academic and administrative programs. | 4.25 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.1.1 There is adequate allocation of state-of-the-art ICT resources to different units based on need and national standards. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.1.2 ICT resources are accessible for use by both faculty and students. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.1.3 Training for the use of ICT to support learning is periodically provided to the faculty. | 5 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.1.4 Training for the use of ICT facilities is made available to students. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.2 The established policies regarding the selection and effective use of information and communication technology resources are religiously followed. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| I.3 Adequate and continual support to effect learning on how to use ICT resources and access information in different formats are provided to faculty and students. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| Implementation mean | 4.08 | |
| Outcome/s | ||
| O.1 Updated instructional materials are available. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| O.2 Students use ICT in the academic activities and are challenged to create innovative projects/outputs. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| O.3 Faculty use ICT for teaching, thus making classes interesting and challenging. | 4 | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) |
| Outcome/s mean | 4.00 | |
| Parameter mean | 4.03 | |
| Best Practices | Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab) | |